Categories
Law

The assignment for Chapters 10 and 11 has two parts, each of which is worth five

The assignment for Chapters 10 and 11 has two parts, each of which is worth five points. Please submit your assignment through Canvas. Each is intended to help you apply what we have studied about contracts in Chapters 10 and 11.
Part One: Please give a brief response to each of these hypothetical situations. You must provide an answer for all five of the situations. Pay careful attention to the facts of each situation and apply the appropriate rule that we have discussed in Chapters 10 and 11.
1. William was interviewed for a job as an academic dean on Wednesday, April 1. The university president orally offered William the job right on the spot. William orally agreed to start working the following Monday, April 6, to be employed from that Monday, for one year thereafter. Three weeks after starting the job William was fired without cause and replaced by the president’s friend. Will William be successful in an action brought against the university for breach of contract? Explain briefly why or why not. (Pay careful attention to all of the facts!)
2. Shiloh and Francesca were discussing business over lunch when they agreed on the sale of a five-acre parcel of land. Because neither of them had any paper with them, Shiloh wrote the following on a napkin: “Francesca agrees to purchase from Shiloh a five-acre parcel located at the local address of 137 Poinciana Drive, Jupiter, Florida, U.S.A. for the price of $100,000 per acre. Transfer of title, payment, and possession to take place on November 1, 2021.” Francesca signed the napkin. On November 1, 2021, Shiloh was ready to close the deal and transfer title; Shiloh even had executed the deed and had delivered to the escrow ageent conducting the closing. Francesca, however, refused to pay the purchase price or settle the transaction. If Shiloh sues Francesca for the price of the land, is the contract enforceable? Explain briefly why or why not.
3. Daniel sent an email to Milton offering to sell his Mazda CX-5 to Milton for $5,000. Milton texted Daniel back offering to pay $4,000 for the car. Is there a contract at that point in time? What action would be necessary for a contract to exist between Daniel and Milton concerning the car?
4. Big Daddy owns 200 acres of land, what he described as “the most fertile land west of the River Nile.” Big Daddy offers to sell the land to his son Brick for $1,500 per acre. Brick replies that he does not need 200 acres of land but would like to buy 40 acres at $1,500 per acre. Big Daddy agrees to sell, but neither he nor Brick identify which 40 acres. Later, Big Daddy refuses to sell any land to Brick. Can Brick enforce the contract? Explain briefly why or why not.
5. The Nerd Brigade is a small local computer and office operating systems consulting firm that entered into a verbal agreement with Dewey Cheatham & Howe, a local law firm, wherein The Nerd Brigade agreed to provide systems consulting and management services to Dewey Cheatham & Howe. The agreement also provided that The Nerd Brigade would supply Dewey Cheatham & Howe employees with some proprietary operating manuals. What law governs this agreement (the UCC or the common law)? Why, and how do we make that determination?
Part Two: Imagine that you are starting your own company in your very competitive industry. (Think of a specific industry about which you have some understanding and information.) You are putting your life savings, your professional contacts, and your innovative ideas on the line. As you begin to hire a sales force, you consider binding new employees to non-competition agreements. Outline generally the ideal terms of your employees’ non-competition agreement. What is its duration? What is its geographical radius? Are those terms appropriate for your industry? Why you believe that your non-competition agreement is enforceable.
TO AVOID ISSUES WITH THE PLAGIARISM CHECKER, PLEASE DO NOT COPY THE QUESTIONS INTO THE ANSWERS THAT YOU SUBMIT.

Categories
Law

Your first task is to select a suitable article that is related to Equal Employm

Your first task is to select a suitable article that is related to Equal Employment Opportunity:
In light of issues related to racial, social, and economic justice; discrimination and harassment based on race, gender, national origin, religion, and disability; etc. you should be able to find articles for an EC review paper.
The article you select must have been published after March 1, 2020 in a newspaper, business magazine, or journal, whether in print or on-line format. News articles or academic journal articles are appropriate. The Wall Street Journal, New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Atlanta Journal-Constitution regularly publish articles on business law topics, as does Bloomberg News, Forbes, Business Week and Fortune magazines.
Do NOT use an article or reading from the course e-book or a story from Yahoo News (or similar outlet), company or agency press release, information posted on corporate or private websites, etc.
In addition, make sure that the article you select raises a legal issue in business or examines that business topic from a legal perspective. It should be long enough (typically at least 1000 words) and provide sufficient background and/or detail to enable you to discuss its legal significance.
If it doesn’t, you may combine your article with related articles that collectively provide sufficient information for the paper. If you base your paper on more than one article, attach all the articles you used to the paper.
Note: Points will be deducted for inappropriate articles, by either topic or date!
Writing the paper:
Download the form from the next page. Write your paper in the form, expanding sections as needed, but do not exceed two pages, without prior approval. This paper is worth up to 15 extra-credit points.
• First, provide the bibliographic information for your article. If you located your article on-line, make sure that you provide the full web address as well as the title, author and date of your article.
• Next, summarize the article. Assume that I have not read the article you selected. Make sure you provide enough information in your summary so that I can understand the topic without opening the link to your article. If I have to read your article to understand the summary or to identify the legal issue(s) it raises, you will not receive much credit for this section of the paper.
• Finally, explain in some detail how your article relates to the course. Be specific. For example, assume you selected an article about an employment discrimination case decided by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in September 2016 (too old for this semester, but a good example!). The employer had conditionally offered a job to an African American applicant, but then refused to hire her when she would not cut her dreadlocks to comply with the company’s “grooming standards.” The court held that this did not constitute race discrimination. You would need to explain (and much more fully than the following) that Title VII prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of race, which the Court interpreted to mean biological characteristics, rejecting the EEOC’s argument that race also includes cultural characteristics associated with a particular race. You might also discuss the impact that focusing exclusively on biological factors might have an impact on LGBT cases alleging discrimination on the basis of gender. NOTE: This section is weighted more heavily than the summary, so spend some time writing a thoughtful essay linking the content of your article to LGLS 3610!

Categories
Law

In the case of Lucy v. Zehmer, Zehmer spent the night drinking with his friend L

In the case of Lucy v. Zehmer, Zehmer spent the night drinking with his friend Lucy. During the evening, a piece of paper was signed whereby Zehmer agreed to sell his farm to Lucy. In this assignment, you will review the full case study in your textbook, analyze the contractual elements and ruling, and indicate whether you agree with the ruling.
Rubric and case is provided.

Categories
Law

Read the Motion in Limine in the case of US v. Felix. Assume you are the legal

Read the Motion in Limine in the case of US v. Felix.
Assume you are the legal clerk for the judge in this case.
In a 3-5 pages, write a legal memo to the judge that recommends how the court should rule on the Defendant’s motion.
· Explain the facts of the case
· Identify the legal issues, and
· Explain how the court should rule
The final two sections should be the core of your submission and include analysis along with at least two scholarly sources to justify your agreement or disagreement with the result.
Use 12-point font.
The title page and reference page are not counted in the 3-5 page requirement.

Categories
Law

Read the Motion in Limine in the case of US v. Felix. Assume you are the legal

Read the Motion in Limine in the case of US v. Felix.
Assume you are the legal clerk for the judge in this case.
In a 3-5 pages, write a legal memo to the judge that recommends how the court should rule on the Defendant’s motion.
· Explain the facts of the case
· Identify the legal issues, and
· Explain how the court should rule
The final two sections should be the core of your submission and include analysis along with at least two scholarly sources to justify your agreement or disagreement with the result.
Use 12-point font.
The title page and reference page are not counted in the 3-5 page requirement.

Categories
Law

Provide a case brief about this case in Florida. (See attachment for case) Only

Provide a case brief about this case in Florida. (See attachment for case) Only has to be one page. Due tomorrow Nov 30 by 12pm eastern standard time. You must use this format for case brief.
CASE NAME AND CITATION
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
FACTS
ISSUES
CONCLUSION
LEGAL RATIONALE/ANALYSIS

Categories
Law

Please construct a rough publish (1 page) with the information below | Outline | I

Please construct a rough publish (1 page) with the information below
| Outline |
Introduction
I. Administrators require certain skills and must undertake significant internal and external obligations to manage personnel properly.
II. The capacity of a manager to understand shared tasks, build equitable work environments, and train subordinates in the art of supervision is critical to an organization’s success and employee satisfaction (Rehan et al., 2021).
III. Regardless of the support for Big Brother Monitoring, employees should have room to exercise their right to privacy.
The Debate on Micromanaging Employees
I. Based on financial, legal, or ethical grounds, individuals might argue for or against employee monitoring.
II. The productivity question is addressed in such arguments based on employee monitoring and its effects on product quality and quantity.
III. Gamal et al. (2018) argue that many businesses monitortheir employees to reduce their leisure time.
IV. A major supportive argument given by Big Brother Monitoring factions is that every second not spent in production leads to reduced profits (Gamal et al., 2018).
The Productivity Puzzle
I. However, many people disagree with extensive employee monitoring.
II. For instance, Brown & Witzleb (2021) hold that such scrutiny can potentially diminish productivity.
III. Frequent monitoring has been related to mental and physical health concerns such as increased boredom, tension, worry, sadness, and rage (Brown & Witzleb et al., 2021).
Solving the Productivity Issue
I. To solve the productivity puzzle, many organizations have evolved to automation.
II. Various firms have chosen automated machines to do core human jobs to support employee privacy.
III. In this argument, both sides of the debate converge at a similar point. Contenders maintain that although automation has lowered the risk of violating human-implemented data privacy and security measures, it has adversely impacted the framework for establishing such policies and maintaining sustainable human employment(Brown & Witzleb, 2021; Gamal et al., 2018).
IV. On one side, humans stand to lose their jobs due to automation. But at the same time, automation enhances the support for employee privacy since robots and machines do not have similar rights.
Conclusion
I. The need for employee privacy and increased productivity is a contentious issue with support from different factions.
II. Aside from the discussed arguments, the rising relevance of ethics and CSR in business has also increased the focus on protecting employees’ personal information.
III. Various states have established industrial rights that ensure an employer does not leak or provide private employee data to third parties (Gamal et al., 2018).
IV. Corporations that violate such rules may face unending legal. Consequently, most businesses foster a culture in which employees’ personal information is secured and all legal confidentiality requirements are followed.
References
References
Brown, M., & Witzleb, N. (2021). Big Brother at Work–Workplace Surveillance and Employee Privacy in Australia. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4011527 Links to an external site.
Gamal, N. L., Taneo, S. Y. M., & Halim, L. (2018). Job Satisfaction Aa a Mediation Variable in the relationshipBetween Safety and Health (K3) and Work Environment to Employee Performance. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 16(3), 486–493. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2018.016.03.13 Links to an external site.
Rehan, M. S., Rustam, F., Ullah, S., Hussain, S., Mehmood, A., & Choi, G. S. (2021). Employees reviews classification and evaluation (ERCE) model using supervised machine learning approaches. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03149-1

Categories
Law

This is a final exam in a essay format. I need a essay written on how the charte

This is a final exam in a essay format. I need a essay written on how the charter relates to indigenous people and their rights in Canada (NOT USA) You must incorporate ingenious politics (Canada only). I have attached a word document with cases and articles from my class readings that must be used to help strengthen your points.
DO NOT CITE ANYTHING YOU USE! This is like a closed book essay, you do not need citations or anything, just reference the author and their idea as if you are going off of memory. The major focus is on what you think about the charter and how it impacts indigenous lives in canada. (Please use at least 2-3 readings as support to help your arguments. Do not use any outside sources except for the ones I have attached on the word document.

Categories
Law

Please construct a rough draft (1 page) with the information below | Outline | I

Please construct a rough draft (1 page) with the information below
| Outline |
Introduction
I. Administrators require certain skills and must undertake significant internal and external obligations to manage personnel properly.
II. The capacity of a manager to understand shared tasks, build equitable work environments, and train subordinates in the art of supervision is critical to an organization’s success and employee satisfaction (Rehan et al., 2021).
III. Regardless of the support for Big Brother Monitoring, employees should have room to exercise their right to privacy.
The Debate on Micromanaging Employees
I. Based on financial, legal, or ethical grounds, individuals might argue for or against employee monitoring.
II. The productivity question is addressed in such arguments based on employee monitoring and its effects on product quality and quantity.
III. Gamal et al. (2018) argue that many businesses monitortheir employees to reduce their leisure time.
IV. A major supportive argument given by Big Brother Monitoring factions is that every second not spent in production leads to reduced profits (Gamal et al., 2018).
The Productivity Puzzle
I. However, many people disagree with extensive employee monitoring.
II. For instance, Brown & Witzleb (2021) hold that such scrutiny can potentially diminish productivity.
III. Frequent monitoring has been related to mental and physical health concerns such as increased boredom, tension, worry, sadness, and rage (Brown & Witzleb et al., 2021).
Solving the Productivity Issue
I. To solve the productivity puzzle, many organizations have evolved to automation.
II. Various firms have chosen automated machines to do core human jobs to support employee privacy.
III. In this argument, both sides of the debate converge at a similar point. Contenders maintain that although automation has lowered the risk of violating human-implemented data privacy and security measures, it has adversely impacted the framework for establishing such policies and maintaining sustainable human employment(Brown & Witzleb, 2021; Gamal et al., 2018).
IV. On one side, humans stand to lose their jobs due to automation. But at the same time, automation enhances the support for employee privacy since robots and machines do not have similar rights.
Conclusion
I. The need for employee privacy and increased productivity is a contentious issue with support from different factions.
II. Aside from the discussed arguments, the rising relevance of ethics and CSR in business has also increased the focus on protecting employees’ personal information.
III. Various states have established industrial rights that ensure an employer does not leak or provide private employee data to third parties (Gamal et al., 2018).
IV. Corporations that violate such rules may face unending legal. Consequently, most businesses foster a culture in which employees’ personal information is secured and all legal confidentiality requirements are followed.
References
References
Brown, M., & Witzleb, N. (2021). Big Brother at Work–Workplace Surveillance and Employee Privacy in Australia. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4011527 Links to an external site.
Gamal, N. L., Taneo, S. Y. M., & Halim, L. (2018). Job Satisfaction Aa a Mediation Variable in the relationshipBetween Safety and Health (K3) and Work Environment to Employee Performance. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 16(3), 486–493. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2018.016.03.13 Links to an external site.
Rehan, M. S., Rustam, F., Ullah, S., Hussain, S., Mehmood, A., & Choi, G. S. (2021). Employees reviews classification and evaluation (ERCE) model using supervised machine learning approaches. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03149-1

Categories
Law

Provide a case brief about this case in Florida. (See attachment for case) Only

Provide a case brief about this case in Florida. (See attachment for case) Only has to be one page. Due tomorrow Nov 30 by 12pm eastern standard time. You must use this format for case brief.
CASE NAME AND CITATION
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
FACTS
ISSUES
CONCLUSION
LEGAL RATIONALE/ANALYSIS